Sarah J. Maas’s A Court of Thorns and Roses trilogy presents two of romantasy literature’s most divisive characters: Tamlin and Rhysand—two High Lords whose contrasting approaches to love, power, and protection serve as perfect narrative foils.
While popular discourse has largely vilified Tamlin in favor of Rhysand, a closer examination reveals that Maas crafted Tamlin as a far more complex character whose flaws stem from genuine trauma and whose actions, while misguided, often spring from the same protective instincts that readers celebrate in other characters.
Tamlin’s Unexpected Masculinity
Tamlin emerges as something unexpected in fantasy literature—a male love interest who expresses himself through art rather than aggression. His relationship with Feyre does begin with a classic Beauty and the Beast kidnapping scenario, but what actually captures her heart isn’t his power or dominance. It’s his fiddle-playing. His poetry. His quiet creativity that blooms even under a curse.
Here’s a High Lord who tends gardens and writes verses, who responds to emotional turmoil with music rather than warfare. In a genre dominated by brooding warriors and calculating kings, Tamlin represents something refreshingly different: sensitive masculinity that isn’t ashamed of its own tenderness.
This artistic nature becomes crucial to understanding his later actions. When trauma strikes, Tamlin doesn’t retreat into cold calculation or strategic manipulation—he loses control in messy, emotional, fundamentally human ways. His magic lashes out not from a desire to dominate or to hurt others, but from overwhelming feeling. The same sensitivity that makes him create beauty also makes him vulnerable to devastating emotional responses.
Yet somehow, the narrative convinces readers to reject this emotional authenticity in favor of someone whose feelings are always perfectly managed, whose responses are always calculated. We’ve been taught to see Tamlin’s artistic sensitivity as weakness and his emotional honesty as dangerous.
Jekyll and Hyde in Prythian
You literally cannot analyze one of these characters without addressing the other. They’re like Jekyll and Hyde, Frankenstein and his creature—deliberately positioned to reflect and contrast each other in ways that make independent analysis impossible. Their characterizations shift in tandem throughout the series. When one rises, the other must fall.
This is where Maas shows her hand as a master manipulator of reader psychology.
In book one, when we’re meant to sympathize with Tamlin, Rhysand’s actions are described as horrific. We witness him physically and sexually abuse Feyre Under the Mountain. He holds the power while Tamlin remains powerless, and this dynamic is framed as unquestionably wrong.
But then book two arrives, and Maas needs to rehabilitate Rhysand. How does she accomplish this narrative sleight of hand? By having his foil exhibit controlling behaviors while becoming colder and more distant. The same protective instincts that made Tamlin appealing in book one suddenly become evidence of his unsuitability.
Rhysand functions as Tamlin’s narrative opposite in nearly every way, yet ironically embodies far more traditionally masculine power structures. Where Tamlin is transparent, Rhysand operates through secrets and shadows. Where Tamlin responds emotionally, Rhysand calculates every move. Where the artist-poet shows vulnerability, the warrior-king maintains perfect control—even his breakdowns are strategic.
The genius lies in how Rhysand’s complexity masks behaviors that mirror Tamlin’s supposed sins. His mental manipulation, information withholding, and decisions made for Feyre’s “own good” echo the very controlling behaviors readers condemn in Tamlin. But presentation is everything, and Rhysand’s manipulations come wrapped in romantic sacrifice rather than desperate protection.
When Algorithms Shape Literary Discourse
Here’s where things get really fascinating from a reader psychology perspective.
BookTok and Instagram have embraced Rhysand with the fervor of religious converts. These platforms thrive on visual aesthetics and quick content consumption, making them perfect breeding grounds for the mysterious, powerful love interest whose complexity condenses beautifully into mood boards and thirty-second thirst traps. Rhysand’s darkness is easily romanticized in short-form content—all smoldering looks and protective possessiveness without the messy emotional complexity.
But here’s where it gets particularly telling: Tamlin’s artistic sensitivity isn’t just ignored on these platforms—it’s actively mocked. Rhysand fans deploy sexist nicknames like “Tampon,” reducing a character defined by creativity and emotional vulnerability to gendered slurs. His fiddle-playing becomes a joke, his poetry dismissed as weakness. The very qualities that should represent progressive masculinity are treated as emasculating failures.
This reveals something uncomfortable about what readers actually want versus what they claim to want. While celebrating Rhysand as the “feminist choice,” they’re simultaneously rejecting the male character who embodies artistic expression, emotional openness, and creative vulnerability. Traditional masculine power wrapped in progressive language wins over actual sensitive masculinity every time.
Meanwhile, Tumblr and Reddit have fostered entirely different conversations. These platforms’ longer-form content and discussion-based formats create space for the kind of textual analysis that often reveals Tamlin’s genuine growth and questions Rhysand’s perfect facade. Users dissect character motivations, examine trauma responses, and call out narrative inconsistencies with the intensity of literature PhD candidates.
The analytical nature of these spaces has created room for users to resist the narrative’s guidance and examine what’s actually happening versus what they’re told is happening. They notice when the same possessive behavior that makes readers hate Tamlin suddenly becomes sexy when Rhysand does it. They question whether protection becomes suffocation or devotion depending entirely on who’s doing the protecting.
This digital divide reveals something crucial: platform culture shapes literary interpretation as much as the text itself. We’re watching real-time creation of different canons, different readings, different truths—all from the same source material.
Growth vs. Revelation
Here’s what gets overlooked in all the discourse: Tamlin actually grows.
Not the flashy, dramatic character development that gets celebrated in book reviews, but the quiet, painful kind that happens when someone genuinely confronts their failures. By the final book, he’s learned to step back, to let Feyre make her own choices, to support her even when it costs him everything he thought he wanted.
His decision to help save Feyre and Rhysand in the final battle? That’s not plot convenience—that’s genuine character development. He chooses love over possession, support over control, Feyre’s happiness over his own desires. This growth isn’t pretty or dramatic, but it’s authentic and earned through genuine suffering and self-reflection.
Meanwhile, Rhysand’s “development” largely consists of revelations that he was secretly good all along rather than actual change. His arc feels less like transformation and more like vindication—satisfying for readers who invested in him, but ultimately static. The powerful, strategic leader that is revealed in book two is essentially the same person we see in book three, just with more information available to justify his actions.
The narrative celebrates the reveal but ignores the growth.
The Question of Consent and Agency
Perhaps the most contentious aspect of the Tamlin-Rhysand debate centers on questions of consent and female agency. Tamlin’s attempts to control Feyre are rightly criticized, but they exist in a narrative that often overlooks Rhysand’s more subtle manipulations.
Tamlin’s control is obvious and therefore easily identified and rejected. His mistakes are visible and undeniable. Rhysand’s influence operates more subtly—through mental bonds, strategic information sharing, and emotional manipulation disguised as protection. The text presents this as romantic, but it raises questions about what kind of agency Feyre actually maintains in her relationship with him.
This doesn’t excuse Tamlin’s behavior, but it suggests that the narrative’s treatment of consent and control is more complex than popular discourse acknowledges. Tamlin’s flaws are condemned while Rhysand’s similar behaviors are romanticized, creating a double standard that says more about presentation than actual harm.
Conclusion: Master Class in Reader Manipulation
The genius of Maas’s character construction isn’t in creating one clearly superior love interest—it’s in demonstrating how easily readers can be led to predetermined conclusions.
Watch people argue for hours about Tamlin vs Rhysand, drawing battle lines like they’re defending real people. Most don’t even notice how Maas guides every reaction, every emotional response, every moral judgment. The same protective behavior that makes readers despise Tamlin becomes romantic when Rhysand exhibits it. The same control issues are framed as either suffocating or devoted depending entirely on narrative positioning.
Tamlin and Rhysand succeed as narrative foils precisely because they force readers to confront uncomfortable truths about their own biases. We’ve rejected the sensitive musician-poet in favor of the powerful warrior-king while believing we chose the progressive option. We’ve condemned genuine emotional responses while celebrating calculated manipulation. We’ve demanded growth from one character while excusing stasis in another.
The platform-based divide in fan reception ultimately reveals how context shapes interpretation more than content ever could. Visual platforms celebrate aesthetic power fantasies while discussion-based spaces allow for deeper examination of actual behavior and growth.
But perhaps that’s the mark of truly effective narrative foils—they continue generating discussion, forcing examination of assumptions, revealing new layers with each reading. The trilogy’s lasting impact lies not in determining which love interest reigns supreme, but in using their contrast to expose how we consume romantic narratives and what that reveals about our own desires and blind spots.
In the end, both characters serve crucial roles in exploring the complexity of healing, trauma, and learning to love in healthy ways. The real story isn’t about who deserves Feyre—it’s about how Maas manipulated an entire fandom into passionately defending predetermined positions while thinking they reached those conclusions independently.
Rin's Reads 
Leave a comment