Romantasy has completely flipped the script on how we think about narrative perspective in genre fiction. While traditional romance loved its third person dual POV and epic fantasy stuck with omniscient storytelling, romantasy has grabbed onto first person and never let go. This isn’t just authors being trendy, it’s a smart response to what modern readers actually want and what sells books. We’re talking about a genre that exploded from $454 million to $610 million in a single year.
This shift makes perfect sense given the cultural moment: pandemic-driven escapism needs, social media reading culture, and a generation that grew up expecting authentic, immediate emotional connection in their media.
The psychology behind the “I” voice
First person POV in romantasy works like an intimacy machine, creating what researchers call “narrative immediacy.” Basically, there’s almost no gap between what’s happening and how it’s being told, and minimal emotional distance between reader and protagonist. This is totally intentional. Modern readers, especially the 18-34 crowd that drives romance sales, want that confessional quality that only first person can deliver.
The psychology is actually pretty fascinating. When a romantasy protagonist says “I felt his magic brush against my skin,” readers don’t just understand the sensation, their brains actually simulate it. Research shows this triggers self-referential brain regions that third person just can’t reach.
This creates strategic vulnerability. Romantasy protagonists spill their fears, desires, and insecurities directly to readers, making us feel like confidants rather than just observers. The effect gets amplified by fantasy elements. When someone discovers they have magical powers or can see through supernatural glamours, experiencing that revelation through first person feels like receiving a personal secret.
Market forces and the intimacy arms race
The commercial success of first person romantasy reads like a masterclass in knowing your audience. Sarah J. Maas has sold nearly 40 million books worldwide, with her first person A Court of Thorns and Roses series consistently dominating sales charts. Rebecca Yarros’s dual first person Fourth Wing and Iron Flame sold over 1.1 million copies combined, with Iron Flame breaking preorder records.
These numbers don’t lie—first person sells.
But there’s something deeper happening than just sales figures. Publishers initially pushed back against the first person trend, with industry professionals at romance conventions openly saying they “disliked first person POV.” Traditional romance had thrived on third person dual POV, letting readers see both romantic perspectives and understand relationships from all angles. The industry’s eventual embrace of first person shows they finally acknowledged that reader preferences had shifted faster than publishing gatekeepers expected.
BookTok deserves major credit for this revolution. The platform’s algorithm rewards visceral emotional reactions—crying, screaming, (throwing up), dramatic readings—exactly what first person romantasy delivers. When BookTokers create content showing genuine responses to intimate first person scenes, they’re not just marketing books; they’re demonstrating the emotional payoff that first person provides. This creates a cycle where emotional immediacy becomes both the product and the marketing strategy.
The market has effectively trained authors to write in first person to increase their chances of getting published, creating a cycle that makes first person the expected choice for new romantasy.
The self-insert controversy and the blank slate problem
Maybe the most misunderstood part of first person romantasy is how it handles the balance between self-insertion and actual character development. Critics often write off the popularity of first person as just enabling “Mary Sue” fantasies, but successful romantasy pulls off something more sophisticated: it allows readers to project themselves while still maintaining real characters with agency and flaws.
The trick lies in what you might call controlled identification. Good romantasy protagonists stay specific enough to feel real while avoiding details that might turn readers off. They experience authentic emotions—fear, desire, confusion—that feel universal even in fantastical situations. When a character thinks “I didn’t understand why my magic felt different around him,” the magical context is pure fantasy, but the underlying experience of attraction making you feel vulnerable is something most people recognize.
However, the oversaturation of first person POV in romantasy has created a real problem: the rise of blank slate female main characters with no genuine characterization or agency. In the rush to make protagonists “relatable,” too many authors have stripped away anything that might make their FMCs distinctive, interesting, or, crucially, active participants in their own stories.
These blank slate protagonists are designed for maximum projection rather than being fully realized characters. They tend to have vague backstories, generic personality traits, and reactive rather than proactive approaches to plot developments. They stumble into magical situations, have things explained to them, and often need to be rescued or guided by male characters who possess the real knowledge and power. The first person POV becomes a trap, readers experience everything through a character who has no real character to speak of.
This creates what you might call “hollow intimacy.” Yes, readers get direct access to the protagonist’s thoughts and feelings, but when those thoughts are generic and those feelings are predictable, the intimacy becomes meaningless. Instead of emotional rehearsal with a compelling character, readers get emotional rehearsal with a placeholder.
The best romantasy hits a sweet spot: protagonists are relatable enough for identification but distinct enough to feel like fully realized people. They make choices readers might make but have agency that drives the plot forward rather than just having things happen to them. This separates effective first person romantasy from problematic self-insertion by keeping character autonomy within relatable emotional frameworks, but too many books in the genre fail this test entirely.
Modern romantasy has also gotten creative with dual first person POV, switching between romantic partners to give multiple intimate perspectives. This serves the genre’s need to explore both sides of romantic tension while keeping the immediacy that makes first person so appealing. Authors like Rebecca Yarros have mastered this technique, creating distinct character voices that let readers experience the romance from both perspectives without losing that intimate connection.
The cost of the first person gold rush
While first person has undoubtedly contributed to romantasy’s commercial success, the oversaturation has created some serious quality issues that are becoming harder to ignore. When every debut author feels pressured to write in first person to get published, and when publishers prioritize marketability over characterization, we end up with a flood of books featuring interchangeable protagonists.
The market forces driving this trend have created perverse incentives. Authors know that distinctive character traits might alienate some readers, so they default to creating protagonists with the personality equivalent of vanilla ice cream: inoffensive, broadly appealing, but ultimately forgettable. These FMCs often share eerily similar voices, thought patterns, and reactions to events, making the “intimate” first person experience feel mass-produced rather than personal.
What’s particularly frustrating is how this trend wastes the potential of first person POV. Done well, first person should give us access to a unique consciousness, a distinctive way of seeing and processing the world. Instead, we often get protagonists who think in romance novel clichés and react to extraordinary circumstances with predictable responses. They’re not characters experiencing a story, they’re vessels for readers to pour themselves into, which ultimately cheapens both the reading experience and the storytelling craft.
This problem gets compounded by the genre’s focus on rapid publication schedules and series potential. Publishers want protagonists who can carry multiple books without becoming too specific or complex, leading to characters designed for longevity rather than depth. The result is protagonists who remain essentially unchanged across entire series, learning just enough to advance the plot but never developing into fully realized individuals with genuine agency and growth.
How romantasy changed the game
Romantasy’s commitment to first person represents genuine innovation that sets it apart from both traditional romance and fantasy conventions. The genre has developed smart techniques for handling traditional first person limitations: world-building emerges through the protagonist’s learning process rather than info-dumping, multiple perspectives get achieved through alternating first person chapters or magical abilities that let protagonists experience others’ emotions, and political complexity gets filtered through personal stakes rather than exposition.
Modern romantasy has influenced broader genre fiction trends, with other genres adopting first person approaches they previously considered unsuitable. This represents a fundamental shift in how publishers and authors think about reader engagement, prioritizing emotional connection over traditional narrative complexity.
The broader implications extend beyond romantasy. The success of first person in this genre shows that contemporary readers, especially younger ones, prioritize emotional authenticity over traditional literary polish. This challenges academic assumptions about narrative sophistication and suggests that effective storytelling needs to evolve to meet changing reader needs rather than stick to traditional conventions.
Bottom line
The prevalence of first person perspective in romantasy represents more than just a stylistic choice, it’s a strategic response to psychological, commercial, and cultural forces shaping how people read today. By providing immediate emotional intimacy, making reader identification easier, and creating immersive fantasy experiences, first person has become essential to romantasy’s mission of delivering both romantic satisfaction and escapist wonder.
This narrative choice has transformed the genre from a niche category into a major market phenomenon, influenced broader publishing trends, and created new expectations for reader engagement in genre fiction. The success of first person romantasy shows that when narrative techniques align with reader psychology and cultural needs, they can reshape entire literary landscapes.
But success has come with costs. The oversaturation of first person POV has led to a merging of protagonist voices and a troubling trend toward blank slate characters designed for projection rather than genuine storytelling. When market forces prioritize relatability over characterization, we get intimate access to protagonists who aren’t interesting enough to merit that intimacy.
The first person revolution in romantasy isn’t just about POV preferences, it’s about recognizing that effective storytelling needs to serve the specific needs of its audience rather than conform to traditional literary expectations.
The challenge now is maintaining that reader connection while pushing back against the formulaic approach that threatens to drain the life out of the very intimacy that made first person so appealing in the first place. The best romantasy shows it’s possible to have both accessible, engaging protagonists and genuine character development—but too much of the genre has settled for just the former.
Rin's Reads 
Leave a comment